Archives
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (3)
- January 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (5)
Tags
12th-century logic 13th-century logic Albert of Saxony Albert the Great animal communication Anselm of Canterbury apprehension Aquinas Aristotle Ars Burana Augustine Averroes Avicenna Bartholomäus Schnitzer Bianca Bosman Boethius cassatio categorical propositions cognition conferences conjunction consequence Eloise d'Argenteuil Emmerich Kratzer ex contradictione ex falso ex impossibili fallacies Frederic Goubier Garlandus Compotista Graziana Ciola Gustavo Fernandez Walker Henry of Ghent hypothetical propositions insolubilia John Buridan Julian of Norwich Lambert of Auxerre Magali Roques Margery Kempe Martin Lenz modality Nicolaus de Orbellis nugatoria obligationes Ockham Ockham's Razor Paul of Venice Pedro-Simon Abril Peter Abelard Peter of Spain Porphyry Priscian Roger Bacon Rudolf Goclenius Sara L. Uckelman semiotics signification Simon Hewitt sorites speech spoken language Stoics supposition syllogisms syncategoremata Syncategoremtata Monacensia temporal logic Thomas Aquinas Thomas Bradwardine thought Tractatus Anagnini Walter Burley William of Ockham William of SherwoodBlogroll
Tag Archives: William of Sherwood
The Logicians Who Say ‘Ne’
I’m currently in Stockholm for the 3rd Nordic Logic Summer School where I’ve been giving a introduction to logic in the Middle Ages. I brought along the Big Four (the textbooks of Bacon, Sherwood, Lambert, and Peter), as well as … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Lambert of Auxerre, ne, Peter of Spain, Roger Bacon, Sara L. Uckelman, syncategoremata, William of Sherwood
1 Comment
Ex impossibili sequitur quidlibet in the 13th C (part 2)
Oh, look, it’s Thursday again! Time to write another medieval logic post. We’re still doing Aristotle in my intro class, so I haven’t any new interesting medieval tidbits from class prep to share. So I guess I’ll just return to … Continue reading
Integrating medieval logicians into Introduction to Logic
Term starts next week, and I am so pleased to be teaching again what is probably my favorite course ever, Introduction to Logic. Most of it is going to be a pretty standard Intro Logic course: syntax and semantics of … Continue reading
What’s in a name?
Yesterday I was writing up comments on an essay on Heloise and Abelard, and found myself, somewhat to my surprise, stubbornly referring to her exclusively as “d’Argenteuil”. After all, we call him “Abelard”, not “Peter”, so why shouldn’t we afford … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Albert the Great, Anselm of Canterbury, Augustine, Eloise d'Argenteuil, John Buridan, Julian of Norwich, Lambert of Auxerre, Margery Kempe, Peter Abelard, Peter of Spain, Roger Bacon, Sara L. Uckelman, Thomas Aquinas, Walter Burley, William of Ockham, William of Sherwood
2 Comments
Spotlight on William of Sherwood
When one thinks of the big names of medieval logic, it’s probably ones like William of Ockham, Jean Buridan, and Walter Burley that come to mind — or, if you’re a 13th C person, maybe Peter of Spain. So people … Continue reading
Medieval logicians on ‘and’, Part 2
In this post I continue my tour through what medieval logicians have to say about ‘and’ or conjunction (here is Part 1). Roger Bacon in the Art and Science of Logic [1] introduces a distinction between when ‘and’ is used … Continue reading
Medieval logicians on ‘and’, Part 1
Another item on my todo list reads “24. Med Log on &”. So much research time and effort is put into the conditional, or the consequence, and also into negation, while other propositional connectives are relatively little discussed, at least, … Continue reading
